<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Superpositioned: Always be wary of schematics</title>
    <link>http://superpositioned.com/articles/2006/03/13/always-be-wary-of-schematics</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Electronics news and projects in the frequency domain</description>
    <item>
      <title>Always be wary of schematics</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ladyada.net"&gt;Ladyada&lt;/a&gt; has an interesting &lt;a href="http://www.ladyada.net/rant/?p=6"&gt;rant&lt;/a&gt; on her &lt;a href="http://www.ladyada.net/rant/"&gt;new blog&lt;/a&gt;.  In linear circuit analysis, we tend to ignore the difference between the positive and negative inputs.  However, in practice positive feedback results in a &lt;a href="http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_8/12.html"&gt;bistable&lt;/a&gt; circuit.  (Also read up on &lt;a href="http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_8/4.html!"&gt;negative feedback&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Usually everyone ends up remembering this detail the hard the way.  While designing a tape head preamplifier she was utilizing this circuit from an application note:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://superpositioned.com/files/wtf-amp.jpg" alt="Oopsies"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;After a few hours of staring at the circuit and debugging and wondering &#8220;man why the hell is this railing?&#8221; I finally look back at the datasheet and realize: oh its in positive feedback, of course its railing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just a reminder that the textbook (or pdf) isn&amp;#8217;t always right!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:03:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:76b0a4f7-2770-47c9-a29e-2aaddb81e70f</guid>
      <author>Matthew</author>
      <link>http://superpositioned.com/articles/2006/03/13/always-be-wary-of-schematics</link>
      <category>Tutorials</category>
      <category>schematics</category>
      <category>opamp</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Always be wary of schematics" by madmanmark</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s from the Analog OP27/37
&lt;a href="http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/5021673OP37_b.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data&lt;em&gt;Sheets/5021673OP37&lt;/em&gt;b.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;page 13 for those who want instant gratification&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:10:55 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:5b4d8cf9-3ee5-4f40-a6d7-0ff251846646</guid>
      <link>http://superpositioned.com/articles/2006/03/13/always-be-wary-of-schematics#comment-124</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Always be wary of schematics" by Matthew</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It actually comes from an application note.  I am unsure of the specific source because she did not reference it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Either way, it is an easy mistake to make and easy to correct.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:35:22 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f4c6c07d-bdee-449e-bd6a-e5d771f3e5ad</guid>
      <link>http://superpositioned.com/articles/2006/03/13/always-be-wary-of-schematics#comment-107</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Always be wary of schematics" by Frank</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You MUST name the text/reference book this came from!  WE MUST KNOW!
The author and publisher must be publicly shamed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:d138b24f-19f1-412e-895f-e9349e5d86d7</guid>
      <link>http://superpositioned.com/articles/2006/03/13/always-be-wary-of-schematics#comment-106</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
